It is ironic that the genius of groups like AA, Weight Watchers and other self help groups lies in their use of small groups for accountability, mutual support and recruitment. It is also ironic that most of the fastest growing churches also use small groups for the same purpose.
Such small group strategies are nothing new. In the 18th century, a small man with a huge vision implemented a small group strategy to disciple converts from the coal mines of Britain. It brought cohesion to the Wesleyan Revival which spread across the British Isles and America. George Whitfield, a contemporary and at times a combatant of Wesley, wrote the following toward the end of his life. ” Mr. Wesley chose the wiser course. He organized his followers into bands (small groups) and they persevered,my followers are like a “rope of sand”. Two hundred years later, David Lowes Watson, a church historian and Wesley scholar, said these small groups were the “Muscle of Methodism.”
The irony comes from the fact that the tradition that became the symbol of small group ministry, has all but abandoned the small group strategy. From 1968 until 2008, United Methodism has lost 3 million members, from just under 11 million to less than 8 million members. Could it be that part of the decline is the result of abandoning what Watson called “the Muscle of Methodism”?
Why is it that small accountable, support groups are no longer popular in Methodism? The answer to that question would involve more space than a blog is designed to devote, but at the risk of over simplifying the subject, we Methodists just don’t want to give a strict accountability for our discipleship to a small group. We also are not comfortable with laying bear before others, our deepest thoughts and yes even sins. We want a religion that is proper and respectable rather than one that is rigorous and personal. In other words, we want a laid back kind of faith that is pristine, rather than one that opens up the messy part of our lives, thank you.
For the past few months I have had the opportunity of visiting a congregation that has built its ministry around what it calls Missional Groups. They are at the heart and soul of it’s polity. The congregation is young, in fact we are one of the few gray haired folks in worship. (Carol would remind me, there are few gray hairs on her head). The lay people seemed animated and focused in their faith. There is a vitality in carrying out their mission through these Missional communities.
I think Methodism today can re-kindle its flame that spread scriptural holiness across the globe, but only by remembering the genius of our founder, not through a new program or organization, but through recovering the intimacy and accountability of the “Muscle of Methodism”.